In our first of a three week focus on implementing the Common Core State Standards, we were asked to look at a document released by The College Board for the National Coalition for Core Arts Standards. The document, entitled The Arts and the Common Core: A Comparison of the National Core Arts Standards and the Common Core State Standards, looked at language in the National Core Arts Standards and the Common Core State Standards for alignment between the two sets of standards. Continue reading
The template for Student Learning Objectives provided by the Illinois State Board of Education is very similar to the Individual Teacher Professional Development Plans that our school district uses for teacher evaluations. For our ITPDPs, we must identify a PLC Team Goal, an Individual Teacher Academic Goal, and an Individual Teacher Behavior Goal. Each of these goals are required to be SMART goals (specific, measurable, assignable, realistic, and time-specific) aligned to student achievement. The PLC Team Goal can be the same as either the Academic or Behavior Goal. Within each of these goals, we identify learning goals and action steps for ourselves towards student achievement. We must demonstrate how these goals align with the Iowa Teaching Standards and the Danielson Components. We must also identify indicators of progress towards the goals. Below is a comparison of the two templates using the elements of the Illinois SLO as the benchmark: Continue reading
We are currently in the final week of a three week unit looking at measuring student growth in my VanderCook MECA class entitled Teaching Music in a Common Core World. Our assignment over the past two weeks has been to develop two Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a means of measuring student growth as part of our teacher evaluation. This post contains the second of my two SLOs as well as a comparison between Illinois’ requirements for an SLO and my district’s (Ankeny, Iowa) requirements for our Individual Teacher Professional Development Plan (ITPDP). Continue reading
We are currently in the second week of a three week unit looking at measuring student growth in my VanderCook MECA class entitled Teaching Music in a Common Core World. Several of my most recent posts detail the work I have been doing in that class in regards to teacher evaluation, measuring student growth, and the new National Core Music Standards. This week and next we are developing two Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) according to the Illinois State Board of Education‘s (ISBE) template. Continue reading
Our VanderCook class, Teaching Music in a Common Core World, just finished a five week look at teacher evaluation using the National Association for Music Education’s Building and Evaluating Effective Music Educators in the School Ensemble workbook, the new National Core Music Standards, and the Charlotte Danielson Framework for Teaching. We have now begun a three week study of student growth.
Over the past five weeks in my VanderCook class, Teaching Music in a Common Core World, we have been working through the National Association for Music Educators (NAfME) Workbook, Building and Evaluating Effective Music Educators in the School Ensemble, as well as the new National Core Music Standards. The workbook and the process tie the NAfME expectations to the Charlotte Danielson Framework for Teaching. As a conclusion to this part of the course, we were asked to reflect on the process with the following prompt:
Complete a comprehensive reflection paper. Include a recap of the concepts and strategies learned from the assignments that you completed over the last four weeks. This will fulfill part of the VanderCook College of Music exit assessment requirement. Take your time and thoroughly reflect on what we have covered over the last four weeks. This document needs to be worthy of 10% of your overall grade for the Teacher Evaluation unit of your grade.